|
The Sky and Telescope Eclipse Tour, 2002
Richard JacksonSky and Telescope and TravelQuest International organized a wonderful trip to Africa and the Indian Ocean for the total eclipse of the sun. My wife Virginia and I departed from Houston on Saturday, 23 November. The tour itself started from Nairobi on 25 November with a three-day safari in two of Kenya's game parks, partly in the Masai country at the base of Mt. Kilimanjaro. Staying overnight just north of Mombasa, we learned only around noon the next day (Thanksgiving) of the hotel bombing some three kilometers north of our hotel and of the missile attack on an El Al airplane that morning. We boarded the Marco Polo Thanksgiving afternoon for a voyage to the eclipse site. Our scheduled visit to the island of Zanzibar was canceled owing to a terrorist threat (I was most disappointed because I had been looking forward to visiting the clove and cinnamon plantations), but we did steam past the Comoro Islands, and we spent the better part of Sunday, 1 December, near and on the island of Nosy Komba, just off the north coast of Madagascar.
Three more days of sailing brought us to the eclipse path in the Indian Ocean. I had selected this method of seeing the eclipse on account of the discouraging weather reports for the African mainland and the brevity of the eclipse in Australia. My choice nearly failed.
After the eclipse the journey continued to Richard's Bay, Durban, Port Elizabeth, and Cape Town, South Africa. Supplementary tours at each of those places gave us additional game viewing and a visit to the magnificent Cape Point at the Cape of Good Horn. As we sailed southwest, he skies were not the darkest, but we did get to see many of the things that I had wanted to observe ever since childhood, the Magellanic Clouds, the Tarantula nebula, the Southern Cross, the Eta Carinae nebula, the globular cluster 47 Tucanae, etc. I never did see the Coal Sack near the Southern Cross, however, but I twice saw the green flash. We left Cape Town on 12 December and arrived back in Houston on Friday, 13 December. We had been very well fed on land and on sea, and our hotel and game lodge accommodations bore no resemblance to the old photographs of primitive safaris with tents. Most of the details of the journey had been organized by the Orient Lines, and nearly everything was extraordinarily well organized.
The Sky and Telescope eclipse team originally consisted of Richard Tresch Fienberg, editor-in-chief of Sky and Telescope; Owen Gingerich, professor emeritus of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; and Stephen James O'Meara, a well known amateur astronomer who, with his wife Donna, is also known for stunning photographs of volcanoes. David Levy, another famous amateur astronomer, and his wife Wendee joined the team at the last minute. It would be difficult to imagine a more impressive group of professional and amateur astronomers. While the Marco Polo steamed towards the eclipse site, the four gave lectures about the forthcoming eclipse, and after the eclipse they discussed what they had seen, as well as presenting talks about their current areas of study. As the eclipse itself proceeded, Rick Fienberg used the ship's audio system to provide a fine (or Fien?) running commentary on the progress of the eclipse, to predict aspects of the eclipse, and to warn people to remove or replace their solar viewing glasses.
We almost did not see the eclipse, though. Upon arising around 6 A.M. the morning of Wednesday, 4 December, there were opaque clouds directly overhead. The Marco Polo was heading east at a leisurely 5.5 knots along the eclipse path, and we could see a very clear sky ahead of us, so it all looked most promising. After another hour of sailing, that clear sky was as far away as it had been before breakfast, which was served early. Another hour of sailing brought us to 8 A.M., we had gotten no closer to that clear sky, and totality was only half an hour away. The captain poured on steam, and the ship's speed increased to 18.5 knots, apparently near its maximum; having begun life as a Russian icebreaker, the Marco Polo was not built for speed. By 8:15 it was beginning to look hopeless. We could follow the progress of the eclipse whenever the clouds thinned out a bit, but there was going to be no chance of seeing the corona or most of the other phenomena. Around 8:20 Rick Fienberg announced that, sailing as far as we had along the eclipse path, we had actually added a second to totality. That was little consolation, however, for the clear area remained as remote as ever. The only thing that one could say in favor of the clouds is that they attenuated the sun's light sufficiently to permit us to follow the eclipse's progress without need for additional protection for either naked eye or optical aid. I sadly relinquished any hope of seeing totality.
Then, just before totality, a break appeared in the clouds, and I photographed the nearly fully eclipsed sun (see the accompanying photo). It was not a clear break, but it was an improvement. The clouds moved so that the most open part of the break appeared between us and the sun just as totality began. What we saw was glorious: Baily's beads, the diamond ring, the red chromosphere, red prominences, and the inner corona. The outer corona was hidden by the clouds throughout the entire eclipse, and no stars or planets were visible. In a selfless display of marital affection, I attempted to hand my binoculars to Virginia so that she could see the eclipse through them, and that is when things went wrong for me. I had forgotten that I had tipped my safari hat back so that it was hanging down my back by its chin strap. The binocular strap was under the safari hat's strap, and I could not remove the binoculars. In a panic I fought the two straps. I would have just let Virginia view the eclipse naked eye only, but by now I was choking on the safari hat's strap and had to remove it. I finally did so, throwing the cursed object to the deck, not caring whether I ever saw it again. I had missed 15-20 seconds of totality. I handed the binoculars to Virginia, and she got to see some of what I had seen. Virginia soon handed the binoculars back, and I had just gotten them refocused on the sun, when totality ended in a truly surprising blaze of color as the chromosphere extended nearly one-third the way around the sun and Baily's beads reappeared. We were at 26 degrees 2 min. S and 35 degrees 37 min. E. Our course was 92 degrees at 18 knots. Totality (second contact) began at 8:29:59 A.M. and ended (third contact) at 8:31:30, for a duration of 95 seconds. (I know that the figures do not work out right - I copied them from the Marco Polo's Daily Program. One of the times is incorrect because we had added a second to the 94 seconds at the original eclipse site.)
The ship continued its unaltered direction along the eclipse path for several hours. We never did reach that patch of open sky. The south or southwest wind was just fast enough to keep it ever tantalizingly in front of us. I now know how the donkey feels about the carrot. I also learned how fortunate we were. I later heard that Kruger National Park in South Africa was clouded out, although I did talk to someone who had seen the eclipse in Botswana, where the sky was perfectly clear.
During two sessions that afternoon, the Sky and Telescope eclipse team discussed the eclipse and then threw the floor open to the audience, some of whom had seen ten or more eclipses of the sun. The Marco Polo's captain, Nenad Mogic, thought that he had failed us by not getting us under a clear sky. The eclipse team expressed great satisfaction, however. It is true that we did not get to see the full extent of the visible corona, but the eclipse was the most colorful one that anyone had seen, some of the most experienced observers got to see things that they had not previously seen, and we were able to follow most of the eclipse without needing eclipse glasses. I had not gotten to photograph any part of totality on account of the difficulties with the straps. The best photograph that I saw on board ship was taken by Eric Roel. It is visible at Sky and Telescope's WEB site http://skyandtelescope.com/news/current/article_804_1.asp. Roel's photograph not only shows some of the stunning color of the eclipse, but also conveys very well the appearance of the eclipse as seen through 10 or 20 power binoculars.
I can most highly recommend a good GPS receiver for a journey like this - I used mine a lot, as did others. I was pleasantly surprised to find that mine, a Magellan SporTrak Pro, had built in quite satisfactory maps of Africa and the Indian Ocean. I used it to track our location, heading, bearing, speed, and atomic-clock time. I used it to check elevation (on land only, obviously, although it did give our elevation variously as 50 to 80 feet above sea level, which was about right for the decks that I was on). It was particularly helpful in orienting me to the unfamiliar southern skies. David Levy was upset that he forgot to bring his GPS along, and Owen Gingerich was upset when his ceased to function; I could understand why in each instance.
I wish that I could take the trip again. It was a lifetime experience in almost every respect. And I did recover my safari hat sometime after the end of totality.
Return to top
Asteroid Occultations of Stars
Scientific observations Wanted in Houston! Due to improvements in prediction techniques and expansion of candidate asteroids, more and more asteroid occultations are being predicted with increasing accuracy. However, timing data is badly needed in order to learn more about the sizes and shapes of these solar system objects. Amateurs in the Houston area can easily contribute to the body of knowledge by using their own equipment at home. But increased value is gained with more widely distributed observers within 100 miles of the center of Houston. The average star occulted in 2002 is about 10th magnitude. Timings can be made visually using a tape recorder and source of accurate time signals (short wave radio obtaining
from Radio Shack); or they can be made by more popular video cameras which can also be used to image other celestial bodies (PC-164 camera available from http://www.superciruits.com in Austin for $170) and the output recorded on a camcorder.An asteroid occultation might be expected to occur locally once every 3 months. I would like to determine the coordinates of all interested observers who are capable of locating such dim stars and making the timings that usually consist of a disappearance and a reappearance separated by 1 to 20 seconds on average. A 4 to 6 inch telescope can be used for some events, though a C8 or larger gives better definable images of the fainter stars. An occultation can occur at any time of night and on any day of the week.
Although most members live within 25 miles of the center of Houston, it is even more important to get locations of observers who live farther away in such places like Conre, Liberty, Beaumont, Lake Jackson, Victoria, Columbus, etc. who can be contacted for last minute alerts via email.
I would like to mention that amateur astronomers in Houston have done some really great things in the past such as having composed the team for the most successful asteroid occultation on record (1983) and the most successful grazing occultation expedition on record (1973). These records still stand today; since then more and more competent observers have appeared on the scene with better equipment. If your observations are successful and enough data is put together to establish a shape for the asteroid, a paper will usually be published in which all observers are given co-authorship. This helps to give personal recognition to the unique effort that each observer has made.
Discovery opportunities also exist. It is possible that such observations can lead to the detection of a hidden component of the star that is being occulted or a natural satellite of the asteroid. These are real possibilities that await the diligent occultation observer.
Anyone who would like to seriously participate in future events of this nature from home or on the road (mobility gives us better flexibility and coverage), I would ask you to please contact me via email (pdmaley@yahoo.com) and provide either your latitude/longitude measured via GPS or your street address, telescope aperture and method of recording. I check this email every few days. Alternatively you can also call me at 281-2440208. More information on occultation observation can be found from my web site at http://www.eclipsetours.com/maley and select OCCULTATIONS.
Paul D. Maley
Vice President, International Occultation Timing Association
Scientific Expedition Coordinator, JSC Astronomical SocietyReturn to top
A Letter From the Space Station
21 October 2001
ISSDear Family and Friends,
It seems to me that no matter where you are, there is occasionally an hour in the day that is just completely different from the normal, routine hour. Maybe it's an hour with the kids, maybe an hour in the garden, maybe an hour reading a great book. I have those special hours in space sometimes, too. Actually, every hour in space is special and a privilege, and that is never too far from my awareness, even in the difficult times. But some are even better, and I had to write this one down.Living in space. This is truly being an astronaut. This is what I've wanted to do since I was 13 or younger. This is a dream come true, even more than my first flight, which was almost like going home. At least, it was like going to a place I felt like I had been to before and in which I felt at home. The only things missing are family and friends. But the privilege of being here and living this special dream was reinforced this evening.
At the end of a fairly routine Sunday - one without much scheduled by the ground but with tons of "domestic chores" to do - I was tired, but decided to look out the window as we crossed the northern tier of the US at sunset. Since I had told my daughters to watch for us, I decided to see if I could spot the places where they are now. We have a pair of nice binoculars with rudimentary image stabilization, so I was surveying all I could see out the southern facing starboard window of the Docking Compartment "Pirs". I'll just run through the series of semi-spectacular sights I was fortunate enough to see this evening in less than an hour:
We came across the coast near Vancouver, B.C., an area that is always beautiful to see, with interesting coastal shapes and channels. As we continued across the continent to the Northern Rockies, even in the fading light one could see how rough and dramatic the landscape below us was. I could see very bright western faces and totally black eastern slopes, with the low sun angle accentuating the peaks and valleys so that the contours were exaggerated in the evening light. As I scanned the mountains, I picked up what looked like a nail tracing an arrow-straight line rapidly across dark ice, leaving a bright-white, spreading trail in its wake. A high-flying jet, still lit by the sun, was headed west over Montana as the earth below was already dark. The aircraft was clearly visible in the binoculars as a bright point pulling the line rapidly across the sky.
Glancing around without the binoculars, I saw with some satisfaction that the western sky was again the comfortable spider-web of contrails we normally see over the US and Europe, so much better than the empty sky of the week of September 11. Since the station was still brightly lit and the earth below getting pretty dark, I assumed that we were fairly visible to those so inclined to look up. Looking back at them, the Earth was too dark in contrast to the sun reflecting off the window, so I moved up to the limb of the Earth to watch the always-varied effect of the sunset on the view of the atmosphere at the distant horizon. I could see cloud layers edge-on, rather than the usual view from above, as well as the shapes of towering thunderstorms far to the south. The colors of the clouds began gradually changing as the sun quickly settled to the western edge of the Earth, and the colors glowed every shade of orange and red imaginable, varying with their proximity to the sun. The edge of the atmosphere at the horizon is normally a fuzzy, light blue when the sun is high in the sky, but as it sinks, distinct lines appear of varying widths and "blueness", darkest closest to the Earth, then lighter, then darker quickly at the upper reaches of the atmosphere. Shades of blue I've never seen from Earth were visible in each band, especially at high magnification. The colors spread, then quickly collapsed toward the sun as it plunged through the atmosphere behind
us, rapidly becoming a red fireball, then a red-hot point on the horizon as refraction held it suspended in view longer than it was
really there. The solar arrays of the station turned from gold to copper to a deep red, with a final mysterious glow even when the sun was gone, as if they held residual light of their own, just before we hit total darkness. And even before the sun had set, I began to see stars shining through the atmosphere to join the ones clearly visible above us. One of the interesting exercises is to try to determine if a star on the horizon is actually above or below the true horizon and if it is above or below the edge of the atmosphere, because they can be seen long before they rise into the unobstructed view we have from orbit. Seeing them below the cloud layers is definitely interesting at times, however. I wonder if it will be disorienting for EVA.As we left the sun behind and the glare faded, the magnificent cities on the East Coast of the US magically appeared in the blackness below, outlining the Atlantic seaboard as clearly as if drawn on a map with a pen filled with glowing orange ink. From my perch over the North Atlantic - Boston, New York, Atlantic City, Norfolk, Charleston, Jacksonville - all could be seen lighting up for the evening as we sped out over the ocean and headed southeast. And hanging in the sunset above them were, I think, both Mercury and Venus.
Since I had been lucky enough to see the Aurora Borealis a couple of weeks ago, I decided to switch to the port side of the spacecraft for a moment to see if it was still there, since we were pretty far north. No Aurora, but I caught Orion's bright outline as it began to climb out of the airglow, and as I followed the belt-line to Sirius, I noticed a very bright object nearby. Putting the binoculars on it, I saw a very odd shaped star. Since my eyes at my age seem to require frequent refocusing of the instrument, I tried to get the oblong shape to become round and it just wouldn't match the other stars. I finally realized I was seeing Saturn for the first time from space, and that without the distortion of the atmosphere it was possible to see the rings with just the binoculars! What a sight! I was so happy, but it became even more interesting a little later.
Returning to the starboard side as we crossed the equator, I began to see huge cities on the northeast coast of South America, with gigantic thunderstorms forming dramatic backdrops over the Amazon basin, single lightning flashes traveling what must have been hundreds of kilometers across the cloud tops, illuminating huge areas of the Earth. The cities, I learned from the atlas later, were Fortaleza, Natal, and Recife, appearing as spread out and as large in area as any that can be seen in the US, indicative of the huge population moving into them from the Amazon rain forests, I suppose. There were very large and very bright forest fires outlining large areas of the blackness west of the cities, again, probably indicative of large-scale land clearing in one of the great rain forests of the Earth. Further south, Sao Paolo and Rio de Janeiro were visible, with the very bright lights of Ipanema and Copacabana trailing thinly south from Corcovado.
I soon found the Southern Cross in the sky and then focused the binoculars on the quarter moon, marveling at the detail visible at this magnification with the low sun angle across the craters and mountains. Impressed by the beauty of the lunar landscape with no atmospheric distortion, I turned my attention to what appeared to be Jupiter, with only one faint moon visible tonight. I've seen as many as four, easily. As I was trying to pick out more Jovian moons, I caught what I thought was a moving light zipping through the star field above it, very fast, and very dim. Couldn't be a meteor (They appear below us.) A satellite! Totally unexpected, though certainly possible. We were nearing orbital midnight, so it must have been fairly high altitude to have any illumination at all. I was able to follow it for about 30 seconds before it became too dim. It was impossible to determine its exact inclination (or direction of travel) while looking through the narrow field of view of the optics, but it appeared to be crossing our orbit at a fairly high angle.
While thinking to myself how lucky I was to have seen that - the only other time I saw another manmade object in space while in orbit was when we saw the Mir go zipping by Discovery (STS-51) in September, 1993 - I returned to searching for moons when almost immediately I saw another, slightly brighter and faster, object enter the field of view! This time I was able to follow it for over two minutes, even though it became pretty dim, also. I could use the offset vision technique pilots use for catching dim points of light by stabilizing the binoculars everytime I lost it and having it reappear in my off center (peripheral) vision. This way I followed it until it entered the airglow at the horizon. Quite interesting, and much faster than the apparent motion of the Station or Shuttle when viewed from Earth.
Quite happy, I turned back toward Jupiter, and was met by yet another unusual sight! I saw what appeared to be an enormous red dust storm on the horizon, with a base of green and blue. At first I thought I was getting some kind of unusual glare on the window panes from a sunrise, though it seemed too early, and it didn't really look like a sunrise. I went back to the port window to see if it was there, also, and sure enough there was something there, but it was even more dramatic. Curtains of red and green lights hung in the sky, reaching higher than our orbit and shimmering and glowing in a magical way I've never seen before. It looked as if we were about to fly right through it! I raced to the Service Module and grabbed a camera, hurriedly trying to change to the settings for a low-light photo. I took a few at various speeds, though probably not quite slow enough; maybe when the experts adjust the brightness and contrast of the digital photos the Aurora Australis can be seen. It had a totally different character than the Northern lights, and was quite dramatic, especially since it was so unexpected. Absolutely beautiful! I never expected the Southern Lights. After all of that, the routine gorgeous sunrise a few minutes later was almost anti-climatic.
(Full size 35KB)
Aurora Australis, slightly brightened by computer.
Well, that was one short turn around God's block tonight. This is a lesson for all of us: It's amazing what you can see when you just plain stop your hectic pace for an hour and open your eyes wide to watch the world go by. There are a lot of surprises and a lot of beautiful sights in this creation. Let them come to you.
In awe of it all, and lucky to be here,
Frank,
In SpaceReturn to top
The History of the AINTNO 100
People actually want to know how this list of 100 ”unobservables” started. As far as I can recollect, it began with the old GENIE bulletin board in pre Internet days around 1990. Genie had a small group of amateur astronomers who exchanged observations and good will. Robert Reeves and Ron Dawes of San Antonio and Tippy D’Auria of Miami were also frequent contributors.
Lightning Strikes
One day, after I had been off-line for quite some time (my computer got hit by lightning), I got on the bulletin board. Robert Reeves had posted a message something like, “Wonder where Barbara has been, maybe she's out looking for the cross in M31” (which had just been discovered). Ron Dawes replied: “ AINTNO WAY she's going to see that, the AINTNO Queen.” So I bit on this statement and wrote back asking Ron “What was an AINTNO?” Ron replied “Well, it's an acronym for ‘THE ASSOCIATION OF INVISIBLE NEBULA AND THINGS NOBODY OBSERVES.” We all got quite a laugh and a lot of mileage out of Ron’s wit for weeks on end. They kept on teasing me about going out and trying to observe things that most people wouldn't waste their time on.
Idle Brains and Brainstorms
As things happen, one day a bunch of volunteers at the George Observatory were sitting around during a lunch break at one of our Observatory maintenance and clean up days, just talking about observing. I mentioned the AINTNO thing, and as one thing lead to another, those of us sitting there started coming up with a list of objects that we would all like to see but figured that there was AINTNO WAY anyone would see them (pre-Hubble days). I started jotting down all the suggestions that people made, and soon a decent list began to evolve. It was kind of fun to do. I consulted Larry Mitchell, my observing pal for suggestions, and he came up with many, and agreed to act as an “Association Representative”. We decided on an even 100 objects to include. The list finally made it to 100 objects, and Jeff Hunt actually put the list into a cohesive form (Jeff was computer literate, much more than Larry and I at the time). This was in 1991.
First Test of the AINTNO 100
At the next Texas Star Party (1992), I handed out dozens of copies of the AINTNO 100. It would generate some laughs from seasoned observers, especially since some of the objects were very cryptic and you had to really think about them to get the point, or certainly know quite a bit about Astronomy.
One night at TSP, Tom Polakis called me over to his telescope (Brian Skiff was right there also) and said Barb, I want to show you something.” I looked in and there was a nice bright round bluish planetary staring back at me through an OIII filter. Tom said something like: ”Do you see it.” I was somewhat puzzled that he would ask such a question, but replied “Well, of course I see it.”
Tom then said “Congratulations you are looking at AINTNO No.60 “ What! I replied, no way…. then I yelled across the field at Larry, “ Larry (the planetary expert) Where are you, Tom says this is AINTNO 60 also known as Abell 37”.
BRIAN AND TOM WIN THE DEBATE
This exchange started the whole debate, with Larry contending that AINTNO 60 does not exist because George Abell stole the object from the Index Catalog, as it is actually IC 972. Tom and Brian argued that it did not matter if George Abell catalogued it or not, we had included it on our list as ABELL 37 – and it did exist, and they jokingly demanded their award of an AINTNO Certificate. The debate went on all week, but the result was that we very reluctantly had to award the first AINTNO ½ certificates to Tom and Brian. We named them AINTNO ½ since Tom got half a certificate and Brian got half a certificate, and Larry was still arguing that ABELL 37 was non existent.
Uh Oh, Oh No, Here's AINTNO Number 1/2
Now Larry and I being very cheap, decided that the certificate sure wasn't going to cost us much, and it would have to be appropriate to the spirit of the AINTNO 100. That said, we created the certificates out of black construction paper with black sharpie pen writing on them…a sort of averted vision certificate, you have to tilt the certificate just so to the light to see the writing on it. We reluctantly but graciously awarded Brian Skiff and Tom Polakis their certificates at the TSP Saturday night awards ceremony.
AINTNO 100 GOES INTERNATIONAL
Then unbeknownst to me, Brian Skiff sent the AINTNO 100 list to the Webb Society in England and they published it in the inaugural edition of the “Deep Sky Observer” October 1992. You can imagine my shock when I opened my copy of Deep Sky Observer No. 1 and found the AINTNO 100 had been published in it. The AINTNO 100 was now an internationally recognized list!
To be fair I should recount Brian Skiff's version of the above story as he related it in The Deep Sky Observer October 1992. Brian wrote: “Barbara and Larry have a long list of obscurely named novelty objects such as “Gomez’ Hamburger and Molonglo 3.” They've also assembled a list of true “unobservables” called the “AINTNO 100”. This is a joke on their own searches for the faint and strange as well as on other popular lists such as the “Herschel 400”. Tom and I spot almost right away a clerical error for one entry. This is Abell 37, a faint planetary in Virgo previously catalogued as IC 972. Tom surveyed the Abell Planetaries in 1991 and remembered it. I have observed it in my 15 cm refractor. Later Tom finds the planetary quite easy in his telescope and shows it to Barbara without telling her what it is until she's remarked how bright it is with an OIII filter. Barbara and Larry's list stipulates that you need only to see one of these objects to get a “certificate”. We jokingly demand our award.”
Brian later relates in this same review of the 1992 TSP: “ As a special award, Tom and I receive our “AINTNO 100” certificates, which are constructed cleverly out of dark black paper with some words barely visible on them. Barbara and Larry get matching blooper certificates, and the four of us get lots of laughs from the assembled audience.”
AINTNO 100 IN SKY AND TELESCOPE
Tom, later with his tongue firmly in his cheek, wrote about his and Brian's AINTNO awards in an article on planetaries that he penned for Sky and Telescope magazine. I later got a letter from a person who wanted a certificate for his observation of IC 972! Tom wrote me recently in his review of this history: “I'll add that after my S&T (not Astronomy) article on Abell planetaries, I received a serious letter from somebody in Quebec who demanded a certificate, and sent him your way. I wonder if there will one day be a publication called "Non-Existent objects of the RAINTNO."
TomWow, now that would be something. A scholarly publication pointing out all the errors in the RAINTNO.
I WONDER if Brent Archinal would pen it? (Brent wrote the monograph “NON EXISTENT STAR CLUSTERS OF THE RNGC.”AINTNO CERTIFICATE NUMBER ONE AWARDED! (VERY RELUCTANTLY)
The list languished for a long time until the 1997 Texas Star Party when none other than Stephen James O’Meara demanded an AINTNO Certificate for his observation of the G Ring of Saturn (AINTNO 31). Stephen said he observed the G Ring during the ring plane crossing of Saturn during 1995 with the 36” Lick Observatory Refractor. Things were getting out of hand. Another certificate would have to be awarded.
Stephen pressed us all week, he presented his case, and again we made another black paper with black sharpie pen certificate one morning all bleary eyed from observing to award to Steve. So now, AINTNO CERTIFICATE # 1 was awarded.
Uh Oh, Oh No, Here's AINTNO Certificate Number 1
Revenge, the Revised AINTNO 100
In early 2000, I decided that the time had come for a Revised AINTNO 100. After all, if the NGC (New General Catalogue) catalogue could be revised into the RNGC why couldn't the AINTNO become the RAINTNO? This new list would be fool proof. It would withstand the rigors of amateur astronomers everywhere. It would not be broken.
To create the RAINTNO, I removed all objects that had been observed. Yes, Larry and I actually managed to observe several of the objects on this now 9-year-old list. It was fun to see that things we thought back in the early 1990’s that would be totally unobservable had actually been seen. Things like M57’s outer halo, (which no one had claimed a AINTNO certificate for, even though Brian Skiff was actually the first one to see it through Larry's 36” I guess one certificate for Brian was enough!), an extra solar system planet, (at the time of the making of the list these had not even been found), Andromeda 3 (Larry, myself and Matt Delevoryas have seen this galaxy), and more.
One object that could have been seen but evidently is: AINTNO 95 – the optical counterpart of any gamma ray burst. Remember last year a gamma ray burst occurred which was so bright ( 9th magnitude) that it could have been seen in binoculars? Wow, I'm glad no one saw that, or our sharpie pen would have had a new workout.
I confidently set out the Revised AINTNO 100 at the 2000 Texas Star Party. To illustrate the list I made an arrow out of paper to point to AINTNO Object 100 (which is the arrow that points to Pluto). You know, this is the arrow that shows up on all photographs of Pluto (except for the Hubble images). Well, I messed up drawing the arrow so I drew another and threw the old arrow away. Amelia Goldberg then quickly snatched the old arrow out of the trash. I immediately saw where this was going and tried to grab the old arrow from her. To no avail, she would not let go of it.
Not Again, Another AINTNO CERTIFICATE!
Suffice it to say that by the end of the week at the 2000 TSP, another AINTNO Certificate Number 2 1/2 was awarded to Amelia Goldberg for (you guessed it) AINTNO object No. 100 – The arrow that points to Pluto. Amelia and her cohorts found Pluto in a telescope and laid the arrow on top of the telescope. She then called Larry Mitchell and myself over and showed us Pluto in the telescope, Then Amelia stated that “This is the arrow that points to Pluto”, which of course it did!
Uh Oh, Oh No, Here's AINTNO Certificate Number 2 1/2
So now you know the story, and I hope you enjoy looking over the list. However two words of caution:
1. Only one certificate per object , so no one else can claim the “arrow that points to Pluto”
2. My sharpie is getting dull and dry.With sincere apologizes if you read this far……
P.S. I recently received a letter from the Minnesota observing whiz, Tim Parson who is making a case for
another AINTNO certificate, for AINTNO object 78- Globular 132 in M31, which Tim claims he showed to Larry Mitchell in Larry's own 36” reflector!7/2002 Update
Uh Oh, Oh No, Here's AINTNO Certificate Number 3Not Again, Another AINTNO CERTIFICATE!
Who would ever think that someone can see a "37 minute 46 second" old moon. That is right after new moon! The current record of seeing a young moon is in the 10-hour range. Well, when can you really see a "new moon"? Its during a solar eclipse! Once again, Stephen J O'Meara claims to have seen a 37 minute 46 second moon right after the Aug., 1999 total eclipse visible from Turkey. To paraphrase Barbara and Stephen J., the certificate was awarded after a very intense and comical debate that occurred under dark and cloudy Texas skies. The debate was moderated by none other than that imperial personage and judge of all things celestial, Matt Delevoryas, who offered much valuable insight into the vexing problem surrounding the Moon's apparent silhouette; his words ultimately helped to persuade the defiant (and stodgy) AINTNO committee to succumb to the truth; fortunately, in the end, sound wisdom prevailed.
In 2000, I wrote: It (Revised AINTNO) would not be broken.
Well, I was wrong!Uh Oh, Oh No, Here's AINTNO Certificate Number 4
The revised AINTNO has been broken! We have awarded AINTNO Certificate #4 for (object #46: Any galaxy within 1 degree of the Horsehead.) to Tim Parson of the Minnesota Astronomical Society at this year's 2002 Texas Star Party. Tim successfully observed Mac galaxy 0538-0223 43.6' away from the Horsehead in a P.A. of 275.4 degrees It's position {Megastar} R.A. 05 38 00.0 Dec. -02 23 51. He observed it in his 14.5 inch newtonian.
I have visually confirmed his observation in both my 20" and more importantly in a 13.1" telescope from West Texas with Amelia Goldberg.
Therefore we retire AINTNO object # 46. Any galaxy within 1 degree of the Horsehead. So, this certificate is already claimed. No second certificate will be awarded.
Actually, Larry and I are very pleased to award this to Tim as it was the first real AINTNO to fall without trickery, a REAL observation with an amateur size telescope.
11/2003 Update
Uh Oh, Oh No, Here's AINTNO Certificate Number 5Hey, Barbara
I don't know if you heard already, but last night Markus Tuukkanen and I managed to observe the optical afterglow of gamma ray burst GRB030329 visually. It's located in Leo and it was at the moment of magnitude 14.2. As there's entry 95: "Optical counterpart of any gamma burst. (No space junk, please.)" in AINTNO catalogue I believe you should seriously consider granting us the coveted AINTNO certificate.
Riku Henriksson
FinlandRiku:
The Aintno Committee has proudly accepted your observation of Aintno #95 "Optical counterpart of any gamma burst. (No space junk, please.)" See reply from Larry Mitchell enclosed. Larry says you have to come to TSP to get the certificate, where we will give you the Aintno Certificate #5.I am inclined to make you a virtual Aintno Certificate until you can come to receive the real one. Here is what you do: Turn your computer power saving function on. Go into standby mode. Let screen go black. Stare at screen with averted vision. This is a simulated Aintno Certificate!
Seriously, send me your address. Will create and mail this "dubious document" to you and Markus. Congratulations for being only 5/6th people in the world to qualify for the "coveted" (your words) AINTNO. And in all seriousness, you guys did a heck of a job. I am just sorry I wasn't there to see it.
Barbara Wilson
Aintno CommitteeAnd Larry's reply:
Barbara,
This truly is a significant feat and certainly worth a piece of black paper - They have to come get it however...... TSP is just around the corner. The Aintno just goes on and on and on and on and on and onandonandonandonandon.....WOW!!!
Larry
The Association of Invisible Nebulae and Things Nobody Observes
Presents:
The Revised AINTNO 100
Note: This list is intended for visual observers only. No awarding of a certificate otherwise. Certificates will be awarded for a successful observation of one object from the list. Prolonged attempts at observation of any of these maybe hazardous to your health. Any one unlucky individual of your choosing must verify your observation.
1. Lunar Mascon
2. 3 Deg Kelvin Background Radiation
3. Footprints on the moon
4. Chevron formation on Miranda
5. Sunspots on Rigel
6. Venera 1 on Venus
7. Mare Moscoviense
8. Veil Nebula's progenitor star
9. Ithaca Chasma on Tethys
10. Mendenhall's unphotographic nebula
11. Uranian Moons:Cordelia, Ophelia, or Bianca.
12. Cygnus X-1
13. An extrasolar system planet.
14. Oort Cloud.
15. Rings of Uranus
16. Your choice of: Blue arc in galaxy cluster 2242-02 in Aquarius (gravity lens crescent), or blue arc lensed by Abell 370.
17. Spokes in the Cartwheel Galaxy.
18. Algol's companion star.
19. The crater Stickney
20. Visual eruptions of Pele on Io.
21. Geminga.
22. The bridge between Ambartsumian's Knot & NGC 3561.
23. Craters on Titan.
24. Aphrodite Terra or Alpha Regio.
25. Resolve 1989 PB's binary nature.
26. Craters on Mimas.
27. Nemesis Star.
28. The Great Attractor.
29. 12th Moon of Saturn. (Helene)
30. Central Star of the Bug Nebula.
31. Revised to Braids in the F Ring of Saturn*
32. The light bridge of Stephan's Quintet and NGC 7331.
33. Globulars of Abell 2151.
34. Colors in the Rho Ophiuchi Star Cloud (IC 4604).
35. Any 29th mag blue galaxy.
36. Snickers (galaxy closest to the Milky Way)
37. 3C273’s Jet
38. Hubble Deep Field Galaxy (at least 2).*
39. The lensing galaxy of 0957+56.1 A & B or the astigmatism of the lens.
40. The heliopause.
41. Sagittarius A West.
42. SS433's Jets and W 50
43. Caldera of any lesser Mons on Mars*
44. 7293's outer halo
45. The Galaxy cluster in NGC7293.
46. Any galaxy within 1 degree of the Horsehead. **
47. A star in each eye of M 97.
48. A neutrino
49. Comet Levy-Rudenko
50. .001 second double star at least 10 degrees from the ecliptic
51. Each component of the Castor system.
52. Any 9.5 mag star naked eye.
53. Sample trench from Viking 1 or 2 Lander.
54. A proto star
55. The central Star of Gomez’ Hamburger.*
56. S Andromedae
57. The coma of 2060 Chiron
58. Mutual phenomena of all four Galilean moons (from the east)
59. Hot spot on the accretion disk of a cataclysmic variable.
60. Transit of an asteroid across earth's moon.
61. Sojourner Rover on Mars*
62. Star 235 in Palomar 14.
63. The black hole in M 87, or in NGC 6240.
64. B Cassiopeia.
65. Illuminating star of NGC 3132.
66. The 3 quasars surrounding NGC3842.
67. The dogleg jet of NGC1097.
68. The counterjet in M 87.
69. The protoplantary system around Beta Pictoris.
70. The Egg Nebula's shell.
71. Your choice of: Abell galaxy cluster 2390's blue arclets; or Abell cluster 1689's blue arclets; or Abell 2218's arcs.
72. The companion to V616 Monocerotis, aka: A0620-00.
73. The Magellanic Stream.
74. PSR 1744-24A in Terzan 5.
75. The Black Widow pulsar.
76. The 3nd brightest star in UKS 1*
77. The illuminating star of NGC 3132.
78. Globular 132 in M31.
79. A 37 minute 46 second young moon.
80. Three Supernovae simultaneously in one galaxy.
81. Gliese 569B
82. Einstein's Ring: MG 1131 +0456
83. Vernal Equinox
84. Pioneer 10
85. Resolve Huchra's Lens (Einstein's Cross)(All 4)
86. A naked eye Messier Marathon.(At least 100)
87. Any supernova in the central parsec of a Seyfert galaxy.
88. The Jovian Aurorae.
89. Io sulphur torus.
90. Observe 45 galaxies in the Corona Borealis Cluster.*
91. Planetary Nebulae in M 81.
92. Planet X.
93. Sun glint off of Voyager 1.
94. Dr. Frank's microcomets.
95. Optical counterpart of any gamma burst. (No space junk, please.) **
96. Dactyl*
97. Observe simultaneous Aurora Borealis and Australis from 40ø Latitude north OR south.
98. Simultaneous Solar transits of Mercury and Venus.
99. Observe any two asteroids colliding.
100. The arrow that points to Pluto **YOU WILL NEED CLEAR SKIES
Association Representatives:
Barbara Wilson or Larry Mitchell
1991 Original list
Revised 4/2000 * indicates revision
** Certificate already claimed. No second certificate will be awarded.Return to top
Fan Mail
Subject: RAINTNO #6
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 01:49:47 -0500
From: Robert ReevesI forgot to mention that Venera 1, RAINTNO #6, is not on Venus. It is in solar orbit. But the chances of it ever being optically recovered are nil because contact was lost so soon after launch that no good orbital elements exist for it.
_________________________________________
Subject: Re: History of the AINTNO 100 and the RAINTNO
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 12:01:23 -0700
From: Brent ArchinalBarbara -
Thanks very much for pointing out your new article on the AINTNO, etc. listing. It was very interesting hearing of the history
of the list, and how a few of the objects have been "observed". I'll have to see how many of these I can manage to
observe too eventually...!This is a good enough article that I hope you submit it somewhere for publication, e.g. S&T, the Deep Sky, or the Deep
Sky Observer.By the way, there appears to be one error that you might be interesting in fixing at some point. You have no. 10 as
"Mendenhall's unphotographic nebula". I assume you are actually referring to "Baxendell's Unphotographable Nebula"
i.e. NGC 7088. I'm not sure where you might have gotten the Mendenhall name, although there was a rather famous
Ohio State geologist (and I believe later university president) by this name in the latter part of the 19th century. The Mendenhall glacier in Alaska is named after him. Of course maybe you really do mean to refer to the "Mendenhall nebula", in order to make this even tougher to observe!!Regards,
- Brent
_________________________________________From Robert Reeves:
Hi,Glad to see this important piece of work chronicaled and documented. You think I am joking? Not really. The AINTNO list represents some serious thinking about the universe and displays some rare imagination. If someone takes a serious look at the objects listed, they will gain a rare insight to the clockwork that makes this world spin. ANITNO was a work of jest and fun, but it covers a cosmology that was either unknown or regarded as fantastic when we were children. Keep giving them hell!
You ought to send a note to Ron Dawes about this.
Robert Reeves
_________________________________________Subject: Re: History of the AINTNO 100 and the RAINTNO
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:18:49 -1000
From: Stephen James OMeara
To: Barbara WilsonWell, Barbara,
Nice job. How fun! I'm glad to see the list hasn't changed all that much...so be prepared, because I "aim to claim" another AIN'T No; by the way, you forgot to mention that I too have an AIN'T No 1/2 certificate for my naked-eye sighting of Centaurus A -- that naked-eye elliptical. :-)
Steve O'
_________________________________________From: Egan Mark
To: Barbara Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 12:49 AM
Subject: AINTNOWHOOPS?Hi Barbara
Cool! I found the AINTNO list again. I saw it a few years back on the sci.astro.amateur newsgroup. Lots of laughs then-- and lots of laughs now that I've found it again.
But is there any reason why #s 65 and 77 are the same? Do we have to observe the illuminating star of NGC 3132 twice?
If this is the case, I propose several things:
1. That the second instance have an addendum, such as "in a city over 1 million" or "with 7x50 binocs" or "during a total solar eclipse"
2. or that an entirely new object be added. Perhaps the HAS members can vote on this at the next meeting.BTW, more questions about the list:
#79: "a 37 minute 46 second young moon": can I assume "or younger"?Since there are rules against athletes taking steroids and other mind and body altering chemicals, are there rules for the AINTNO list? Or can I do things like "specially design artificial eyes for myself" or "live in a cave for a year to dark adapt" so that I can see that 9.5 mag star naked eye.....
Mark Egan
Barbara's reply:
Mark, it is definitely an AINTNOOPS. You are the second person to catch this. So, suggestions are open for a replacement for #77.>#79: "a 37 minute 46 second young moon": can I assume "or younger"?
And no you have to observe an exactly 37minute 46 second young moon...after all, the list can't get too easy :)And no there are no rules, except what is outlined on the list.
Barbara
_________________________________________From Geoff,
65. Illuminating star of NGC 3132
77. The illuminating star of NGC 3132.Does this mean there are 2 certificates up for grabs?? Can I use my "Looney-con (reg. US Pat. Off.) anti O-III" filter??
TTFN,
Geoff
______________________________________From Fred Kiesche
Dear Barbara:
I just read the list posted by Jim Shields. Many thanks for coming up with this! I'm just glad I had swallowed my coffee and it had gone down the pipes before I opened the webpage. Otherwise, they probably would have had needed to call for medical assistance to get me to stop choking on my laughter!
I'll have to buy one of those "department store" scopes. They keep claiming I'll see asteroids colliding (#99)!
Fred Kiesche
_________________________________________Sept 20, 2000
From Tim ParsonsDear AINTNO Representatives:
In the fall of 1999, I once again put the Aintno list under micoscope and found that # 45 {from the old list} or # 46 {from the revised list} seemed to be little bit suspicious. It read "Any galaxy within 1 degree of the Horsehead" so right away I booted up Megastar and found out that Larry listed three Mac galaxy's within 1 degree of Horsehead from Megastar plot
The Horsehead's plot {Megastar's position} R.A. 05 40 54 DEC. -02 28 00
Mac galaxy 0540-0240 15.0' away from the Horsehead in a P.A. of 211.2 degrees
It's position {Megastar} R.A. 05 40 22.5 DEC. -02 40 52Mac galaxy 0538-0233 36.5' away from the Horsehead in a P.A. of 261.4 degrees
It's position {Megastar} R.A. 05 38 29.3 Dec. -02 33 28Mac galaxy 0538-0223 43.6' away from the Horsehead in a P.A. of 275.4 degrees
It's position {Megastar} R.A. 05 38 00.0 Dec. -02 23 51Looking at the DSS image's Mac galaxy 0540-0240 seemed to be nonexistent and therefore almost impossible to observe. Mac galaxy 0538-0233 could be observed with a fairly large telescope under dark skies. The bright stars to the southeast will hamper the view a bit, but I still think its doable. Mac galaxy 0538-0223 offered the biggest surprise. Looking at this galaxy, reminded me of some faint NGC galaxy with a small bright core and with faint arms.
This galaxy seemed so bright, in fact that I would attempt it in my little 14.5" telescope from home {remember I live 25 miles north northeast of twin cities}. The first two times I tried for it {9/5/99 and 9/17/99} at home I came away empty handed at 274x. I tried for it one more time on 10/08/99 armed with new eyepiece, a Takahashi LE 5mm {384x}. I bought this eyepiece over all other eyepieces after only one view through Barbara Wilson 20" telescope at the Texas Star Party "99". I was looking at Pal 5 when the whole field came alive with a faint sprinkling of stars over the face of this faint globular cluster!!! {IT WAS
ALMOST LIKE A RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE}!!! {THANK YOU BARBARA}!!!The eyepiece really did the trick because when I put it in I was able to see very faint glow of light just to the northeast of small grouping of 5 or 6 stars of about 14.7 to 15.7 magnitude. The galaxy could, at times be held with averted vision and sometimes with a elongated shape. This would have to be one of the brighter Mac galaxy I've seen!
P.S. This is a bright object to be a Aintno, and I'm in the process of getting it confrimed.
Tim Parson
Aintno Buster
_________________________
Return to top
6" Telescope for a home project - August 1999
Don BatesI recently completed a 6 inch f7.1 mirror and Dobsonian mount. I had always wanted to try making a mirror and telescope and I finally did it! It was frustrating, it was tedious, but at the end of the day, it was well worth it. I now have a 6 inch Dobsonian on a smooth mount with a mirror that is about 1/11 wave accuracy. I began grinding the mirror on February 2, 1999; and finished the scope on June 30, 1999.
My goal was to create a very high quality, portable telescope for my 10-year-old son, Colin. I bought the best components I could find, and spent many hours figuring and testing the mirror. The scope produces very nice planetary images. I tested it on Mars recently and could clearly see surface markings and polar caps. The double double in Lyra was also clearly split into 4 components with distinct diffraction rings. Ronchi gratings produced perfectly straight lines. The three vane spider and very small secondary (1") produce a lovely 6 spike pattern on bright stars.
Here is a list of the main components:
Primary mirror - 6" parabolic mirror figured by hand to 1/11 wave with Beryl coatings. Mirror cell from Novak.
Secondary Mirror - 1" Quartz diagonal mirror with 0.084 wave PV.
Spider - 3 vane spider made by Protosar
Focuser - JMI NGF-mini2 1 ¼ Crayford-style focuser
Bearings - Teflon and Ebony Star
Mount - ¼" Furniture Grade plywood
Tube: ¼" Sonotube
Protostar 3-vane spider
JMI NGF-min2 focuser
Latch assembly on tube box which allows tube to be rotated or re-balanced.
Side Bearings with Teflon and Ebony Star
Looking down the tube at 6" primary mirror.
Another shot of side bearings
6" f 7.1 Homemade Dobsonian made by Don R. Bates
Primary mirror after coming back from the coater
6" f 7.1 Homemade Dobsonian with it’s new owner, Colin Bates (age 10)
Foucault test photograph showing parabola figured to approximately 1/11 wave accuracy.
My reflection in the 6" primary mirror.
Millies-Lacroix graph showing perfect parabola tolerances.
Monte-Carlo Histogram showing 1/11 wave accuracy.
Return to top
Leonid Meteor Shower - Nov. 1998
Here are 3 pictures by Loyd Overcash taken from Ft Davis, TX and Barbara Wilson's Observation Log and report for the most recent shower. After Barbara's report, there is an image and report from Robert Reeves of San Antonio, a friend of the HAS. His image is too good not to be displayed. HAS member Kenneth Drake shares his images with a brief description of each.
![]()
![]()
Leonid Meteor Report
Barbara WilsonSeveral HAS members and Ft. Bend Astronomy Club members went to Loyd Overcash's home in the Davis Mountains to observe the Leonid Meteor Shower/Storm.
We were in an isolated location in the Davis Mountains of West Texas. Longitude 104 west Latitude 30.6 north. On November 17, I tape recorded data (magnitudes of each meteor, location of most, as well as train lengths and colors) on 586 meteors seen in 5 hours and 44 minutes, with 2 short 15 minute breaks.
I estimate the peak occurred for me at 10:38 UT to 10:40 UT with 19 meteors seen in 2 minutes. Similar 2 minute counts just minutes prior to 10:38UT and just after 10:40 UT were 12 meteors per 2 minute counts.
November 16- The Night of the Exploding Meteors!
Last night we observed (Sunday night Nov. 15 to Monday Morning Nov. 16, 1998) from Lympia Crossing with a lot of sporadic meteors seen up until Midnight. Our limiting mag was close to 7, and the Triangulum Galaxy was visible to the naked eye, without using averted vision.
The show didn't really get going until after 3 am CST (9hrs UT). At 4:20 am we observed -6 and -10 bolides that were definite Leonids within 2 seconds. At 5:05 CST one lit up the entire sky, we did not see it; it appeared to come from the north behind the mountains, below the horizon. I was looking south; the sky lit up; it appeared like lightning off in the distance, because the entire horizon lit up. Kenneth Drake said that the ground had a green cast as he looked at his shadow on the ground. My husband Buster was looking north and he said that the entire northern sky lit up. It apparently was everywhere.
The entire place lit up. We have no idea how bright it was, but it was incredible, as people saw their shadows on the ground, but no one saw the meteor.I was putting some eyepieces away at 5:20 AM (CST) (11;20 UT) in our van and 2 bolides that Kenneth and Buster saw lit up the entire inside of the van. It was like daylight to me in the van; the meteor exploded behind me in the west they said. (P.S. Kenneth Drake captured both of these on film, you can see my red light and me in the Van putting away eyepieces, and one bolide over my head!)
The average magnitude last night was 0 to 1 magnitude with most of the fireballs in the Sirius Class (-1.5) upwards past Jupiter in brightness (-2) and a large number in the Venus Class (-4) and one -6 and one at -10. These Leonids left consistent smoke trains; sometimes 2 or 3 trains were visible at one time. 2 meteors in the east southeast I saw within 2 seconds of each other were orange orange and left parallel smoke trains.
The -10 left a smoke train that was visible for to the naked eye for 15 to 20 minutes. We observed it through a 14.5" telescope, where it looked like a storm cloud, white with ribbons and ropy structure similar to the Veil Nebula.
It's smoke train was originally perpendicular to the horizon, then as the upper atmosphere carried it; it ended up being parallel to the horizon and stretched out for 20 degrees in length. The meteor that occurred at 5:20 AM (which was the one that made it seem like daylight in the van) when I examined the train it left, had a hook at its western termination end, then curled around in a backwards "C" shape at its eastern end.
All of the true Leonids we saw this night were unbelievably fast, strobe like in brilliance, and left smoke trains. We did not record numbers, and did not pay attention to the fainter ones; we were so dazzled by the bright ones. But we estimated rates of
40/hr, all brighter than 0 magnitude.November 17
Not as many bright fireballs and bolides as last night, Nov. 16. I observed from 5700 foot elevation near McDonald Observatory along with 8 other observers under perfect sky conditions on the evening of Nov. 16 and morning of Nov. 17. The following is from my tape recorded account starting at 6:22 UT to 12:06 UT Nov. 17.The numbers recorded are my personal observations, with no calculation of ZHR. These are raw numbers.
6:22 UT to 7:22 UT (12:22 CST to 1:22 CST) Limiting Magnitude 7.0
Sky obscuration was 0. Low cloud band hugging the horizon in the south less than 8 degrees in height. Temperature was in the 40's F. Dew point 28 F.
The -5 bolide exploded at 6:59 UT. We observed the first meteor of the evening at less than 1 minute after starting at 12:22 CST that was a -2 meteor. Then the second one also a -2 covered 90 degrees of sky at 12:31 CST.
Radiant altitude at 1:00 AM CST was 6.1 degrees. 41 Meteors seen.
Population breakdown:
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 Point meteor
1 0 0 4 2 14 8 10 1 0 0 17:23 UT to 8:24 UT (1:23 CST to 2:24 CST) Limiting Magnitude 7.0
The -5 meteor left an incredible train over Arabella mountain that was visible for 10 minutes naked eye.
67 meteors seen. Radiant altitude at 2:00 AM CST 18.1 degrees.
Population breakdown:
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 Point meteor
1 0 0 6 11 8 28 11 2 0 0 0
8:24 UT to 9:25 UT (2:25 AM CST to 3:25 CST)
-6 with long train @ 2:32 AM CST. At 9:00 UT (3:00 AM CST) . Limiting Magnitude 7.0. No clouds except a persistent narrow band on the south horizon that was 5 degrees in height, but only 30 degrees in length. Very few faint meteors seen.
On my tape recording I noted at 3:08 AM: (9:08 UT) 4 simultaneous meteors seen, all Leonids, then I go on to say "At times it seems we are getting burst rates of several hundred an hour, but I won't know for sure until I play back the tape."Short break at 3:15 am to 3:20 AM.
121 meteors seen. The radiant was 30.8 degrees in altitude.
Population breakdown:
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 Point meteor
1 0 0 1 8 23 17 21 50 0 0 0 09:26 UT to 10:27 UT (3:26 CST to 4:27 CST)
At 10:27 UT 3 meteors that were 2nd magnitude with short trains were seen simultaneously in 1 second with termination points just east of the radiant.
A -5 left a blue colored train at 10:10 UT.
A -4 left a shadow at 9:26 UT.
A -3 seen at 10:06 UT.
A -3 bolide turned blue then burst at 10:20 UT165 Meteors seen. Radiant altitude at 4:00 AM was 43.7 degrees
Population breakdown:
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 Point meteor
0 1 2 2 16 26 29 58 24 0 1 0 0Kenneth called the single 4th magnitude meteor seen this hour "The Baby Leonid"
10:29 UT to 11:29 UT (4:29 CST to 5:29 CST)
At 10:36 UT the sky was getting light in the east from the strong zodiacal band that stretched from the horizon to M67 (The Beehive) which was near the zenith. Many were blue to blue white in color with a tinge of green this hour. A -1 green meteor at 10:29 UT 26 meteors seen from 10:10 UT to 10:15 UT a 5 minute period
Total for this hour 119 meteors seen with 15 minute break at 11:00 UT.
Radiant altitude at 5:00 AM CST was 56.6 degreesPopulation breakdown:
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 Point meteor
0 0 0 0 1 8 21 50 18 8 0 0 011:40 UT to 12:06 UT (5:40 AM CST to 6:06 AM CST)
56 meteors were seen in 26 minutes. Radiant altitude was 69.3 degrees at 6:00 AM CST. I quit recording at Moonrise.-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 Point meteor
0 0 0 0 3 2 9 20 16 6 0 0 0I estimate the peak occurred for me at 10:38 UT to 10:40 UT with 19 meteors seen in 2 minutes with a radiant altitude of 52.3 degrees.
Post script: Although sporadic meteors were noted, I did not keep account of them or of the Taurids; we might actually caught one of these on film.
Barbara Wilson
Houston, Texas observing from the dark skies of West Texas
The Rainbow Leonid
Robert ReevesThis is image is from Robert Reeves of San Antonio. The image is described in the text.
![]()
Here in Texas, we had a reasonable Leonid display. No storm, but then we didn't expect one either, just a real good shower. The morning of the 17th was great, but the 18th was clouded out here. I got up at 3 am on the 17th and traveled to a site 25 miles NW of San Antonio were I joined a number of other friends at Limber Observatory in the Texas Hill Country. Between 4 am and dawn we were treated to about 300/hr with some brief bursts showing a higher rate of meteors. This is just what we saw visually, not as translated into the classical ZHR statistic.
There were about ten true shadow casting fireballs in that time. The best was at 4:30am and streaked through our zenith. It left a train that distorted into a "U" over the next 10 minutes. This was one of the best meteors I have ever seen, a real "pants-wetter", and it went right through the field of my zenith camera. Visually, it covered 30 degrees and seemed to be frozen in space like a neon sign because the train glowed for so long.
The attached .JPG shows the image of that meteor, which I call my "rainbow Leonid" because it changed colors from green to yellow to red to blue as it flared into a bolide. The image is about 1/2 the field of my 50mm f/1.4 Nikor and the image was taken at f/1.4 on Fuji Superia 400. Enjoy!
Lets hope the '99 Leonids are as active if not more so (As long as they don't nail our satellites!)
Robert Reeves http://www.connecti.com/~rreeves
Kenneth Drake's images
Near -10 mag that developed a smoke train that got blown by the upper level winds before I could even close the shutter. Also notice the faint meteor on the right. (This is a close up section from the original image)
The smoke train from the -10 as it gave Coma Berenices some wave to her hair.
Smoke train from an unrecorded "smoker".
A "rainbow smoker" with remnants of a smoke train in the image field at the upper left edge.
Another "rainbow smoker". Notice the Milky Way and several "redish" nebulae.
Return to top
First, a little background. When an asteroid is discovered and the orbit is determined, the discoverer gets to name the asteroid. In this case, it was Brian Skiff of Lowell Observatory. Brian was asked by HAS member Paul Sventek to name one of his asteroids after Carolyn Hurless, a very active member in the AAVSO in the Ohio area, after her untimely death. Carolyn was well liked and enjoyed having groups over to visit and observe with. During the weekend of October 17, 1998, 5 friends gathered in Virginia, home of George Kelley, Jr. to observe 3434. See drawings with comparisons to the Digital Deep Sky Survey, meet the 5 people that were at this unique star party, and read the stories by Don Hurless, George Kelley, Jr. and David Cortner on the "People" page. The site, courtesy of David Cortner, is located here.
Return to top
RECORDING THE SPECTRA OF BRIGHT STARS
(Without sophisticated and expensive equipment)
By Leland A. DolanAstronomy texts are full of pictures of the spectra of stars, most of them taken using large observatory telescopes. These large instruments can show the spectra of faint stars, in high resolution. However, it may surprise you that you can record the spectrum of a bright star like Sirius, with a cheap prism attached in front of a telephoto lens. And, since the exposure is short, on the order of 15 to 30 seconds, the camera can be mounted on a photographic tripod. Note illustration below. Using such a setup, I managed to record the spectrum of Sirius.
I mounted a cheap war surplus prism in front of a 200mm telephoto lens. The prism was set perpendicular to the diurnal motion of the star. In other words, if the star is on the meridian, then prism disperses the colors vertically onto the film. Increasing the length of the exposure does not increase the dispersion (that is, spreading the colors farther apart), but widens the band running crossways to the spectrum. An exposure of about 20 seconds makes this wide enough so that you can see the line in the spectrum, as shown below.
The image has been greatly enlarged. I took it on black & white film. You might expect color slide film to show “pretty rainbow” colors, but in actuality the picture does not turn out that way. Images on color film are built up from three separate layers (each sensitive to a different part of the spectrum) so instead of the rainbow, you see “humps” of red, green and blue. In this case I used a standard panchromatic B&W film, such as Kodak Plus-X, which has a fairly uniform response across the visible spectrum.
You will note that the spectrum is bright, crossed by dark lines. This is typical of stellar spectra. Sirius is a “fairly” hot, type “A” star and appears slightly ‘bluish” to the naked eye. The prominent Balmer absorption lines cross its spectrum. The Sun, which is a “cooler” type “G” star, has an entirely different spectrum. If you want to view the Sun's spectrum, try this technique on Venus or Jupiter. Don't try it on the Sun! If you find that you like recording the spectra of bright stars, you might really get involved and use more sophisticated equipment, like CCDs to record spectra of fainter stars.
Return to top
Moon and the Polorized Sky
by Leland DolanI have managed to take some pictures of the Moon, only these were taken about 45 minutes before sunset. These were taken on April 3, when the moon was at First Quarter, so I took advantage of the fact that a band of sky, a few degrees on either side of the great circle 90 degrees from the sun, is highly polarized <I hope that sentence make sense>
Anyway, I used a 200mm telephoto lens, with a polarizing filter to take a series of exposures that demonstrate how the filter can be used to darken that region of the sky. The moon's elongation was 92 degrees east of the sun. I first took bracketed several exposures without the filter, then took several with the polarizer crossways to the sky's polarization. This latter produced noticeable darkening of the daylight sky, and increased the contrast of the lunar maria. Then, I took several with the polarizer parallel to the sky's polarization and it looks all "washed out."
![]()
Return to top
On January 16, 1998, I observed Venus (in broad daylight) about seven hours after it had passed "inferior" conjunction with the Sun. The big problem was not seeing the planet, but locating it. Fortunately, on that date the sky was very clear, at least by Houston standards. I used a 60mm Takahashi refractor of 500mm fl, mounted on a heavy-duty photographic tripod. In order to prevent sunlight from entering the telescope, I placed it in the shade, on the north side of a building whose axis ran east to west. Venus was about 5.7 degrees higher in the sky than the Sun, (see illustration, which is not to scale). I made sure that the planet was a short distance above the roofline, so that "really bad" seeing would not deteriorate the image too much.
Before searching for Venus, it was absolutely necessary to focus the telescope, as the contrast between Venus and the sunlit sky was low. I used a 24mm eyepiece (yielding 21x), so focus was not extremely critical. There were no celestial objects (other than the Sun) on which to focus, so I pointed the scope at a building about a mile away, then locked the focus, using a knob on the telescope. I am not a really skilled observer, so I made up for this using a little ingenuity.
As mentioned earlier, the scope was mounted on a camera tripod in an altazimuth configuration. The instrument was not balanced, so it was necessary to tighten the knob controlling altitude, to prevent the scope from dropping back, while panning in azimuth. Using software, I knew when Venus would be near the meridian, so I would to sweep the sky to the south. The first sweep began with the roofline in view. Starting east of the meridian, I panned in a westerly direction until I came to the chimney. Using the chimney as a reference, I elevated the scope about one-half of a field of view, then panned slowly to the east, until it was pointing east of the meridian. Then, back to the chimney, the scope was elevated another half field of view. I am not sure how many sweeps it took, but suddenly, (as I was panning easterly); Venus appeared in the field. I was surprised at how clearly visible it appeared. A little later, a woman walked past, so I showed her the view in the eyepiece, and asked her what she saw. She though it was either the moon or an eclipse. I explained that it was Venus, but I would first let her tell me how she saw it.
While she "guarded" the equipment, I went inside and got some more eyepieces. I used an 18mm eyepiece, which gave 28x, and Venus still appeared fairly sharp. Then using my 7.5mm eyepiece (67x) I found the seeing "useless", so I returned to 28x. I was not able to see the crescent extending beyond 180 degrees. This may have been due to my eyesight or my inexperience in visual observing. Still, I consider this a triumph, having found Venus so close to the Sun at midday.
Return to top
The Midnight Sun Near the Arctic Circle
By Paul SventekIt had been a long time dream of mine to stand above the Arctic Circle at the Summer Solstice and watch the sun arc slowly toward the northern horizon and then begin its arc upwards beginning a new day... all without the sun setting. This of course is visible anywhere north of the Arctic Circle in late June.
So early this year (1997), I began to investigate the possibilities of such a trip. In early 1997 I was still living in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and a quick review of a map of western and northern Canada showed it wouldn't be that extravagant of a trip to head northward to Yellowknife, NWT, and then on to Inuvik, NWT, almost a couple degrees north of the Arctic Circle. In just one evening of searching on the Internet, I found the airlines that flew the route and the hotels that served the arctic community of Inuvik, NWT. (See the Inuvik web page for those interested in taking a virtual trip there. This web site has a news and photo diary of the community along with other sights and features which make it quite an interesting web site to visit). A few emails and phone calls later, I was booked.
I had another astronomical reason for the trip. The moon's orbit is inclined relative to the ecliptic by about 5 degrees. This lunar orbital plane rotates around the earth in about 18.6 years. What this means is there are times when the moon is "riding above" the ecliptic by as much as 5 degrees, and we're currently at a time where in June, when the moon is full, the moon is riding nearly the full five degrees above the ecliptic. This makes a curious sun/moon visibility opportunity only visible a hundred miles or so north of the Arctic Circle. We've all seen the full moon rising in the east with the sun setting in the west... but what about the midnight sun due north a couple degrees above the horizon AND the moon CULMINATING a couple degrees above the horizon DUE SOUTH... simultaneously! Could this curious event be seen from Inuvik? Of course! Use your favorite sky planetarium program to check for yourself (I suggest SkyMap for shareware example). Use June 21, 1997, and Inuvik's lat/long as 68 deg 18 min lat and 133 deg 30 min long (Inuvik is in the Mountain Time Zone eventhough it's so far west... this puts Local Midnight in Inuvik at near 2:56AM MDT)). Is this event visible every year... No! It will be each full moon in June for a few more years, but then the moon's orbital plane will have rotated a bit causing the June full moon to not even rise at all as visible from Inuvik!
So I had two events to look forward to as I stepped off the plane in Inuvik on June 20, 1997: the midnight sun and the simultaneous midnight moon. The midnight moon aspect was possible on only two nights (20th and 21st) which straddled the official moment of Full Moon. Unfortunately I could not get a hotel room for the 19th so I missed this first opportunity (which turned out to have had excellent weather conditions). By the evening of the 20th it had clouded over, and the other chance to see the simultaneous "midnight" moon on the 21st was lost to clouds and rain.
But, I still had three more "nights" to catch the midnight sun, and the photos below show I had better luck after the 21st. In fact, on all of my remaining three "nights" in Inuvik, I was able to watch the midnight sun (at 2:56AM MDT to be precise) and get enough photographic record of it to satisfy my desire.
The sun photo below was taken within a few minutes of 2:56AM MDT on June 24th, 1997. It shows the sun about one degree above the horizon. From the location where the picture was taken, I had about a one degree false horizon due to hills north of Inuvik, so the sun is the proper 2 degrees above the horizon as is expected at Local Midnight.
![]()
Take another moment to look at and think about this photograph. At this moment, from Calgary, Alberta, the sun is over 13 degrees below the horizon with twilight noticeable. From Houston, Texas, the sun is over 25 degrees below the horizon, still well past Astronomical Twilight and pitch black outside. And where is the sun overhead when this picture was taken? The Saudi Arabian Peninsula!
The other photograph is my attempt at "proving I was there!" The compass is turned to Inuvik's magnetic deviation (about 39 degrees!) thus shows True North on its dial. Notice the tiny pebble just below the compass. Notice its shadow. It's pointing DUE SOUTH! This photo was also taken within a few minutes of 2:56AM June 24th.
Return to top
Image of 1996 B1 made on February 14.9 U.T. with a 300 second exposure using the CCD Hi-Sis 22 and Telescope Newton 0.5 m f/3.8 Col Druscie Observatory, Cortina d'Ampezzo (Italy). Authors: Alessandro Dimai, Marcello Pachner and Alessandro Zardini, ASSOCIAZIONE ASTRONOMICA CORTINA.
On the morning of January 27, 1996, Ed was photographing one of his favorite objects, M101 from the HAS's observing site in Columbus, Tx. Using his 4" Takahashi with a Mamiya 645 camera loaded with hypered 6415 and a 3" Takahashi with an ST-4 for guiding, Ed took a 50 minute long exposure. This was to be his last photo of the night because of the coming twilight. After closing the shutter, the film was removed, developed and hung to dry. After some sleep and a quick shower in his trailer, he started examining his "catch" from the previous night. While scaning the negatives nothing seemed unusal, until he got to the last negative. Wait. There is a smudge. The stars are sharp so its not a guiding error. There are 2 other "smudges", M101 and NGC 5474. But what's the 3rd smudge. Luckily he had a similar negative from 3 years ago. It only had 2 "smudges". First thought was a comet. Then nah. But what else could it be?
He called several other members and they called a few more. Ed called Brian Marsden of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, the clearing house for comets. That evening Larry Mitchell, Don Pearce, Lee Cataline, Ken Drake and Mike Gumler arrive at the site about sunset.. Takao Doi and his wife just happened to be at the site. They go over the negative, comparing it to other photos. They check atlases of all types. No "smudge" in that spot. No other known comets in that area. Having to wait until moonset at 1:30am, they then started scanning the area again. The smudge had moved. It was recovered a short distance away, even closer to the NGC galaxy. All confirmed the object. A call was made to Brian again. There is now a new comet in the books: C/1996 B1(Szczepanski).
Return to top
Hi all,
Well after a week or so of deliberation by the IAU, here's the official announcement: http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iauc/08200/08284.html
A separate announcement was made on the cover of the "Star Formation Newsletter", which can be found here in ps format:
http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~reipurth/newsletter.htm
Oh boy, what a roller-coaster ride--anyhow, here's the gorey details. It all started with me processing a widefield image that I took several weeks ago using a 3-inch Takahashi FTC-76 and ST-10XME CCD from my suburban Paducah, KY backyard (NELMZ~4.5). When I noticed something "funky" looking on my image that didn't appear on other images using 12.5-inch R-C's nor the downloadable POSS, I sent this email to Brian S.
------------------------------
Hey Brian,
Do you personally know of any researcher that may be interested in a catalogued Herbig-Haro type object currently undergoing a fairly dramatic increase in brightness? I just completed a fairly deep color composite image of the M 78 area. While comparing my image to several other recent images of the area, I noticed a fairly obvious object on my image that wasn't at all visible on the others despite the images being equally as deep and using the exact same color filters. When I pinpointed the exact location and ran it through an area search on SIMBAD, it shows the object to be HH 22. This wouldn't strike me as being "that" amazing except for the fact that this thing is all but invisible on all of the downloadable POSS 1& 2 images taken with a 48-inch Schmidt, whereas it is one of the more conspicuous features visible on my suburban backyard image done with a 3-INCH refractor! We're talking a gain of several magnitudes, possibly... It is easily visible on all of my images taken through narrowband R, G,&B filters as well as the unfiltered luminance frames. I still have all of my raw data and the spectral response of my camera is well known if anyone would be interested. Just thought I'd run this past ya' before looking into it further--let me know what you think? BTW, you can use the identifier HH22 to locate the object in my attached JPEG.
Thanks, Jay McNeil
-----------------------
Brian immediately urged me to contact Bo Reipurth at Mauna Kea (author of the Catalogue of Herbig-Haro Objects). I did so, and next thing you know, he and Mr. George Herbig are requesting "Target of Opportunity" time on the 8 meter Gemini! Within 24 hrs, they actually GET this time on Gemini! Preliminary data points to this being a very rare FU Orionis or EX Lupii type outburst of the deeply imbedded IRAS 5436-0007, which has also been noted as a the radio source LMZ 12. According to the latest research, LMZ 12 is thought to be an obscured dense dust core with a healthy accretion disc.As for visual observations, I believe that the object would be visible in 16-inch and larger instruments under the best of skies. The 1' total diameter and 15-16 magnitude will likely be misleading however (as most photographic estimates are). However, I would think that the brightest (southernmost) portion of the nebula, which is located immediately north of the responsible star, should be visible at higher powers (>200x). Even more interesting is the fact that most similar cometary-type reflection nebulae associated with pre-main sequence stars tend to fluctuate in apparent brightness and extent as the conditions surrounding their laminating stars alter. PV Cephei (Gyulbudaghian's Nebula) and R Monocerotis (Hubble's Variable Nebula) or just two examples... So it may prove quite interesting to check the area over the next several months for possible brightenings... BTW, below are the original discovery images:
The original LRGB discovery image:
http://wkaa.net/gallery/mcneil/m78Lrgb
Here's the cropped luminance only with labels (and north up):
http://wkaa.net/gallery/mcneil/mcneilnebulalum90labeled
and here's the 10-inch shot through clouds:
http://wkaa.net/gallery/mcneil/mcneilnebulalum65labeled
Thanks,
JayFor more information and links to Jay McNeil's Nebula, click here.
Return to top